Raising the Compliance Bar
The “intensive” nature of CAM and house arrest in one device boosts offender accountability to levels never before seen in the criminal justice system.
In fact, recent studies show that 9 out of 10 offenders are fully compliant while on SCRAMx – freeing courts, probation, and agencies to focus only on the 10% who need their attention.
Before SCRAM|
Random Testing |
- Hit-or-miss nature of random − or point-in-time − testing lets offenders easily drink around tests without getting caught
- Compliance verified only at the time the test is given
- Has the lowest effectiveness in driving accountability and long-term change
|
|
|
SCRAM | 2003 | Continuous Alcohol Monitoring (CAM) |
- AMS pioneers CAM to provide 24/7 coverage and give courts certainty in their monitoring results
- With more than 165,000 offenders monitored, nearly 3 out of 4 were compliant while on SCRAM
- Helps courts and agencies dramatically boost compliance
|
|
|
SCRAMx | 2010 |
CAM Plus House Arrest |
- Drives compliance to over 90% with additional sanctioning power offered by house arrest
- Adjustable supervision capabilities provide additional leverage for managing difficult offenders who try to drink or tamper
- Judges and officers have a comprehensive and effective way to achieve unprecedented accountability
|
*Compliance is defined as having no drinking or tampering events during the full duration of monitoring.